Foward Deployed Engineering
Published on: September 16, 2025
Tags: #fde #go-to-market #strategy #saas
The FDE Model vs. Traditional SaaS
graph TD; subgraph "FDE Model (Problem-First)" direction TB A["Identify a High-Value
Problem Area"] --> B{"Partner with an Early Customer"}; B --> C["FDEs Build Custom Solution On-site"]; C --> D["Learn & Gather Insights"]; D --> E["Generalize Solution into a
Scalable Product"]; E --> F["Expand to Similar Customers"]; end subgraph "Traditional SaaS Model (Solution-First)" direction TB G["Define a Scalable
Product First"] --> H{"Find Customers with that
Exact Problem"}; H --> I["Sell & Onboard"]; I --> J["Scale Sales & Marketing"]; end %% Styling to emphasize key differences style A fill:#d2ffd2,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px style G fill:#cde4ff,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px style E font-weight:bold style F font-style:italic style J font-style:italic
The FDE "Unscalable at Scale" Loop
graph TD; subgraph "On-Site (Field)" direction TB A(Customer N); B["FDE Team Deploys
(High-touch custom work)"]; C{Solves Specific Problem}; A --> B --> C; end subgraph "At HQ (Core)" direction TB E[Core Product & Eng Team]; F["Generalize & Improve the Platform"]; E --> F; end C -- "Insights & Learnings" --> E; F -- "Improved Product (More Leverage)" --> B; %% Styling to highlight the key parts of the loop style F fill:#d2ffd2,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px; style B fill:#cde4ff,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px;
Information Flow: The Learning Company
graph TD; subgraph Customer Site direction TB A(Customer Needs & Problems); B(FDE Team); A --> B; end subgraph Company HQ direction TB C(Product Team); D(Engineering Team); end B -- "Real-time Feedback & Product Gaps" --> C; C -- "Generalized Requirements & Vision" --> D; D -- "New Product Features & Leverage" --> B; style B fill:#d2ffd2 style C fill:#cde4ff
The "Consulting Firm Trap"
graph TD; subgraph Ideal FDE Path direction TB A[Customer A Needs] --> B(FDE Builds Solution A); B --> C{Generalize Learnings}; C --> D[Improve Core Platform]; D --> E[Serve Customer B Faster/Cheaper]; end subgraph "The Consulting Trap (Failure Path)" direction TB F[Customer A Needs] --> G(FDE Builds Solution A); H[Customer B Needs] --> I(FDE Builds Solution B); I --> J[Customer C Needs]; J --> K(FDE Builds Solution C); G --> H; H --> J; J --> L(...); L --> M[No Scalable Product - Just Services]; end style M fill:#ffcccc,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px style D fill:#d2ffd2
The Cultural Divide: Field vs. HQ
graph LR; subgraph "Field (FDE Team)" direction LR A("Priority:
Customer Success (Now!)"); B("Incentive:
Solve the immediate problem, whatever it takes."); C("View of HQ:
'They're too slow and don't understand the real world.'"); A --> B --> C; end subgraph "HQ (Core Product Team)" direction LR D("Priority:
Scalability & Maintainability"); E("Incentive:
Generalize solutions to serve many customers."); F("View of Field:
'They're building messy hacks and creating tech debt.'"); D --> E --> F; end A -- "Requests for
Urgent, Custom Features" --> F; D -- "Pushback on
One-Off Solutions" --> C; style A fill:#f9f,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px style D fill:#9cf,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
Financial Risk: The Trough of Sorrow
gantt %% Subtitle dateFormat X axisFormat %s section Traditional SaaS Initial Burn :a1, 0, 3s Breakeven :a2, after a1, 2s Steady Growth :a3, after a2, 8s section FDE Model Deep Burn (Customer 1) :crit, b1, 0, 6s Continued Burn (Customer 2+) :b2, after b1, 4s Potential Breakeven :b3, after b2, 3s High Growth (If successful) :b4, after b3, 5s